Trellis Research

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Unmatched State Trial Court Coverage: Indexes state court dockets and filings at a scale most general legal-research tools do not reach, covering where most U.S. litigation actually happens.
  • Judge and Verdict Analytics: Provides ruling-tendency and verdict-outcome data that directly informs litigation strategy, venue choice, and settlement posture.
  • Transparent Entry-Level Pricing: Publishes a clear $120/month Lawyer Entry plan, unlike many legal AI tools that require a sales call for any pricing information.
  • AI Assistant Connectivity: A May 2026 Claude connector lets AI assistants query the litigation dataset directly, extending its usefulness beyond the native interface.

Cons

  • Narrow Focus: Its core value is concentrated in state trial court litigation, so it adds little for transactional, appellate, or federal-court-focused practices.
  • Custom Pricing Above Entry Tier: Only the base Lawyer Entry plan is publicly priced; firm and enterprise tiers require a custom quote.

About Trellis Research

Introduction

Trellis is a legal research and litigation analytics platform focused specifically on U.S. state trial courts, a segment of the court system that generates the overwhelming majority of U.S. litigation but has historically been thinner ground for traditional research databases built around federal and appellate case law. Founded in 2018 and having raised $36 million in funding, Trellis positions itself as the largest research platform for state trial court data, using AI to turn raw docket and filing data into structured insights on judges, verdicts, opposing counsel, and motion outcomes. In May 2026 the company launched a direct connector for Anthropic's Claude, allowing AI assistants to query its litigation dataset directly, followed by Trellis Chat in August 2026, agentic research built for state trial courts.

Legal Research

Trellis indexes state trial court dockets, motions, and filings at a scale most general legal-research tools do not reach, letting litigators search by court, judge, case type, and legal issue to see how similar cases have actually played out in practice rather than relying solely on published appellate opinions.

Predictive Analytics

The platform's core differentiator is analytics on judges (ruling tendencies and case-management style), verdicts (outcomes and award ranges by case type and venue), and opposing counsel (litigation history and track record), which litigators use to inform strategy, venue selection, and settlement posture ahead of a case.

Pricing

Trellis publishes a Lawyer Entry plan at $120 per month, covering search, alerts, motion and issue tracking, judge bios, case updates, state law access, and up to three user accounts. Higher-volume firm and enterprise tiers are not fully published and require contacting Trellis directly.

User Reviews and Ratings

Trellis is listed on Capterra and GetApp with generally positive user feedback centered on its unique state-court coverage and judge/verdict analytics, though a single strong consensus numeric score across review platforms was not consistently available at the time of this review.

Verdict

Trellis is a strong, differentiated pick for litigators whose practice runs primarily through state trial courts and who want judge- and verdict-level analytics that general legal-research databases do not offer. It is a poor fit for transactional practices or firms whose work is concentrated in federal or appellate matters, where its state trial court focus adds little value.

Investments

DateInvestorRoundAmount
Aug 2023Top Tier Capital PartnersSeries B$15,000,000
Total (disclosed amounts)$15,000,000

Frequently Asked Questions

Trellis focuses specifically on state trial court dockets, motions, and outcomes, an area with less depth in traditional research databases that emphasize federal and appellate case law, and adds judge- and verdict-level analytics on top of that data.

The published Lawyer Entry plan costs $120 per month for up to three accounts with search, alerts, motion/issue tracking, judge bios, and state law access; larger firm plans are priced individually.

Trellis does not claim to predict individual rulings; it surfaces historical patterns in a judge's past rulings and case management style to help litigators anticipate tendencies, which is a different and more limited claim than outcome prediction.

Yes. Trellis launched a direct connector for Anthropic's Claude in May 2026, giving AI assistants structured access to its state court litigation dataset.

Reviews